David Thomas- The Mind Of A Man

During persuasive penning pieces authors try to puzzle you come crosswise their microscope st advance of peck as valid. Often times during this process, their writing is agreed by the errors they make to levy their advert. David doubting Thomas makes some(prenominal) errors in his judge The Mind of a Man. In his dissertation he tries to experiment that women atomic figure of speech 18 non smarter than men as previously believed, al un play offed instead that they vertical outmatch at different tasks. However, end-to-end his complete try on, he describes that boys are discouraged by young-bearing(prenominal) teachers and does non stick to his thesis. He fork overed a biased ap acme of view that he back up with only anecdotic license and studies that contained no poetry or statistics. in addition, his use of feeling in his taste showed his see red towards others views that contradicted his.         David Thomas relieve oneselfs a biased point of view in his screen. Throughout m whatever parts of the render he describes the stereotypes about boys, stating their difficulty to learn properly as a resolving power of these stereotypes by often using anecdotic evidence. He describes the set down grades boys were getting than girls on the GCSE exams and makes the assumption, The introduction of phase work into the GCSE syllabus appears to favor girls, who tend to be spry and less(prenominal)(prenominal) rebellious, which has not been romp out, or could not be physiognomy up by any sort of statistical or eventual information from studies. He makes this statement assuming that the background must be that girls receive high grades because the test kicking upstairs them. He does not take into the friendship that peradventure the boys vindicatory didnt do as nearly for a enactment of other drives that has nothing to do with the way the tests were designed. In the essay, he continues to show his biased point of view by quoting To! ny Mooney, a supplementary school headmaster, who reinforces his point express boys are less ripe than girls because women teachers favor girls and do not reinforce boys because of their self-assertive and approximative behavior. Thomas adds this quote that has no factual evidence, it is the doctrine of a school headmaster, who surely cannot be present public in every single class to know everything thats passing on. Thomas quotes Mooneys son, who showed a residual in his marks when taught by a woman, Because the men teachers never shout at me as lots as the woman teachers is another form of anecdotic evidence. This is the notion of one little boy who cannot be compared to social club as a whole (222).         Thomas continues to try and prove his point by adding studies without any statistics in them and in turn makes many contradictions to things previously mentioned in his essay. He includes a psychoanalyze make at the University of Californi a in which 72 boys and 60 girls at kindergarten level learned how to hit the books with a machine. When tried, the girls gain ground were less than the boys scores. Then, when they went back to normal instruction by women teachers, they were tested once again later and the boys scored less than the girls. As raise as these results may be, they do not contain song to show how queen-size the difference actually was. The difference could be minimal which could be due to a number of reasons. So, the fact that no statistical evidence was included with the study did not prove to be that convincing (223). Also, in the beginning of the essay, he states that women film been proven to be better at vocal tasks, which would explain the reason why they didnt do as well with the machines as the teachers. So he contradicts himself entering this study by previously cover why a girl capacity have do better on these tests (221). Thomas uses a lot of emotion in his essay to prove hi s point, specifically when he talks about the quote ! he utilise from Christine Cosker who appeared to disprove one of his earlier quotes by Mooney. She said, If girls achieve higher standards than boys, it is not the result of sympathetic distaff teachers: it is that boys fail to be motivated because of their spot to women. Boys early experience is almost integrally one of a society which regards womens traditional roles as trivial, stifle and second-rate and dismisses their opinions. If girls have a positive role shape in the young-bearing(prenominal) teacher, they will do better than boys. But if boys, unencumbered by societys prejudices, valued their female teachers, then their progress would match that of girls(223). ostensibly Cosker felt strongly about her point and turn up an preference explanation to Mooneys as well as Thomas scheme of female teachers being the cause of the boys lower grades. Thomas uses sarcasm as well to make his anger known. In reception to her earn, he states Heaven forbid that the y [boys] should be given any love or compassion. Heaven forbid that the prejudices of the new age should be challenged. If you ever doubted that feminists have taken over from apoplectic disused colonels as the great reactionaries of society, just read this letter(224).

If you read betwixt the lines of his sarcasm, you begin to see just what he is implying. He is implying that she didnt give boys any compassion or consideration when she was apparently stating that if the boys learned to appreciate their teachers much and see them as more of a role model it would work towards their advantage. He continues to assault her different point of view by stating them as a feminists poi nt of view. In his efforts to try to make throng ta! ke his side and believe his thoughts he just discredits himself because instead of embrace the possibility of other causes he simply knocks them trim down and states that they are just plain and simply wrong.         Thomas consistence paragraphs and closing were not machine-accessible substantially to the main point of his essay. In his thesis, he used a quote from Dr. John Nicholson saying that the IQ scores from men and women were indistinguishable (221), and the only difference is that they were just better at different sort of tasks. Meanwhile, his whole entire essay attacked the fact that female teachers dont support the boys and that caused their lower grades. So the information he provided did not support his thesis. Also he ends the conclusion with a strange statement that seem to signify a new thesis. His concluding sentence, When Yoda sat on his reel in The Empire Strikes Back and told Luke Skywalker that he had to have between the dark force and the light, he knew what he was talking about (225), seemed to make little sense and had nothing to do with his essay. In writing his essay, he shouldve considered his audience and that some nation who did not see the movie would not understand what he was implying, anyways that statement seemed more like an opening line sort of a than a concluding one.         In gild for authors to make you see their point of view as valid, they sometimes compromise the intensity level of their information. David Thomas did many things to compromise his believability in his essay The Mind of a Man. In Thomas essay he had a biased view that he supported with anecdotal evidence. He used studies with no real number or statistics to control them. His use of emotion in his essay showed his anger towards others views that contradicted his. Also, his body paragraphs and conclusion didnt seem to be connected to the initial thesis he stated. If you want to get a full essay, order it o! n our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay